Skip to main content
Efficacy

Evidence & Outcomes

A measurable approach to evaluating SayVeritas impact. No vague promises—just specific metrics you can track.

30-Day Evaluation Protocol

Use these metrics to assess whether SayVeritas is delivering value for your classroom:

🎙️

Speaking Minutes / Student / Week

Track with: Dashboard analytics

Baseline: How many minutes did each student speak in class before SayVeritas?

Target: 2-5 minutes of recorded speaking practice per student per week.

📊

Attempts / Student / Week

Track with: Submission counts

Baseline: How many formal speaking opportunities per student before?

Target: 3-5 voice responses per student per week.

⏱️

Teacher Time Saved

Track with: Teacher survey

Measure: Minutes spent per student per assessment on grading/feedback.

Compare: Traditional essay/oral exam grading vs. AI-assisted review.

📈

Growth Trend

Track with: Rubric score history

Measure: Rubric score deltas over 4+ assessments.

Context: Include teacher moderation notes for qualitative insight.

100% Participation Tracking

The "no hiding" metric

Traditional class discussion typically engages 20-30% of students. Voice-based assessments require every student to respond, eliminating the "back row" problem.

20-30%

Traditional discussion participation

100%

Voice response participation

What We Will Not Claim

Honest evaluation requires acknowledging what we cannot promise:

  • No guaranteed test score improvement — Outcomes depend on curriculum, instruction, and student engagement
  • No certification equivalence — SayVeritas is a classroom tool, not a standardised testing platform
  • Context-dependent results — Efficacy varies by subject, grade level, and implementation quality
  • No replacement for teacher expertise — The tool amplifies good teaching; it cannot substitute for it

Evaluation Worksheet

Download our 1-page evaluation worksheet to track your 30-day pilot:

SayVeritas 30-Day Evaluation Worksheet

Week 1: Baseline data collection
- Current speaking minutes per student: ___
- Current assessment grading time: ___
- Current participation rate: ___%

Week 2-3: Implementation phase
- Assessments administered: ___
- Total student responses: ___
- Teacher override rate: ___%

Week 4: Comparison
- New speaking minutes per student: ___
- New assessment grading time: ___
- New participation rate: ___%
- Qualitative notes: ___

Evidence-Linked Reporting

Every claim in our class analysis reports is auditable:

  • Insights link to specific transcript excerpts and timestamps
  • Teachers can click through from summary to source evidence
  • Minimum 8 responses required before generating class-level insights
  • No "black box" claims—AI reasoning is transparent and reviewable